PART II
Pedigree Analysis
Geneticists' and breeders' definitions of inbreeding vary. A geneticist views inbreeding as a measurable number that goes up whenever there is a common ancestor between the sire's and dam's sides of the pedigree; a breeder considers inbreeding to be close inbreeding, such as father-to-daughter or brother-to-sister matings. A common ancestor, even in the eighth generation, will increase the measurable amount of inbreeding in the pedigree.
The Inbreeding Coefficient (or Wright's coefficient) is an estimate of the percentage of all the variable gene pairs that are homozygous due to inheritance from common ancestors. It is also the average chance that any single gene pair is homozygous due to inheritance from a common ancestor. In order to determine whether a particular mating is an outbreeding or inbreeding relative to your breed, you must determine the breed's average inbreeding coefficient. The average inbreeding coefficient of a breed will vary depending on the breed's popularity or the age of its breeding population. A mating with an inbreeding coefficient of 14 percent based on a ten generation pedigree, would be considered moderate inbreeding for a Labrador Retriever (a popular breed with a low average inbreeding coefficient), but would be considered outbred for an Irish Water Spaniel (a rare breed with a higher average inbreeding coefficient).
For the calculated inbreeding coefficient of a pedigree to be accurate, it must be based on several generations. Inbreeding in the fifth and later generations (background inbreeding) often has a profound effect on the genetic makeup of the offspring represented by the pedigree. In studies conducted on dog breeds, the difference in inbreeding coefficients based on four versus eight generation pedigrees varied immensely. A four generation pedigree containing 28 unique ancestors for 30 positions in the pedigree could generate a low inbreeding coefficient, while eight generations of the same pedigree, which contained 212 unique ancestors out of 510 possible positions, had a considerably higher inbreeding coefficient. What seemed like an outbred mix of genes in a couple of generations, appeared as a linebred concentration of genes from influential ancestors in extended generations.
The process of calculating coefficients is too complex to present here. Several books that include how to compute coefficients are indicated at the end of this article; some computerized canine pedigree programs also compute coefficients. The analyses in this article were performed using CompuPed, by RCI Software.
Back to top
Pedigree of Gordon Setter: "Laurel Hill Braxfield Bilye"
(a spayed female owned by Dr. Jerold and Mrs. Candice Bell, and co-bred by Mary Poos and Laura Bedford.)
|
|
|
|
|
Dual CH Loch Adair Monarch |
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland MacDuff |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Dunnideer Waltz |
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Gallant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Kyle of Sutherland |
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Pavane |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Xenia |
|
|
CH Loch Adair Foxfire |
|
|
|
|
|
Afternod Fidemac |
|
|
|
|
CH Loch Adair Peer of Sutherland, CD |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Wee Laurie Adair |
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Lass of Shambray |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Callant |
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Karma |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Amber |
|
CH Braxfield Andrew of Aberdeen |
|
|
|
|
|
Afternod Fidemac |
|
|
|
|
Am.Cn.CH Afternod Scot of Blackbay, CD |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Alder |
|
|
|
Am.Cn.CH Forecast Trade Winds, CD |
|
|
|
|
|
Bud O'Field Brookview |
|
|
|
|
CH Oak Lynn's Bonnie Bridget |
|
|
|
|
|
Borderland Taupie |
|
|
CH Afternod Ember VI, CD |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Simon |
|
|
|
|
Afternod Profile of Sark |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Heiress of Sark |
|
|
|
CH Afternod Ember V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Callant |
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Maud MacKenzie |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Amber |
LAUREL HILL BRAXFIELD BILYE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Callant |
|
|
|
|
Dual CH Loch Adair Monarch |
|
|
|
|
|
Loch Adair Diana of Redchico |
|
|
|
CH Sutherland MacDuff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Anagram |
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Dunnideer Waltz |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Hi‑Laway's Calopin |
|
|
CH Kendelee Pendragon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Callant |
|
|
|
|
CH Wee Jock Adair, CD |
|
|
|
|
|
Loch Adair Diana of Redchico |
|
|
|
CH Afternod Nighean Kendelee |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Simon |
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Wendee |
|
|
|
|
|
Afternod Dee of Aberdeen |
|
CH Halcyon Belle‑Amie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dual CH Loch Adair Monarch |
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland MacDuff |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Dunnideer Waltz |
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Gallant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Kyle of Sutherland |
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Pavane |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Xenia |
|
|
CH Loch Adair Firefly, WD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Afternod Fidemac |
|
|
|
|
CH Loch Adair Peer of Sutherland, CD |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Wee Laurie Adair |
|
|
|
CH Sutherland Lass of Shambray |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Callant |
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Karma |
|
|
|
|
|
CH Afternod Amber |
To visualize some of these concepts, please refer to the above pedigree. Linebred ancestors in this pedigree are in color, to help visualize their contribution. The paternal grandsire, CH Loch Adair Foxfire, and the maternal granddam, CH Loch Adair Firefly WD, are full siblings, making this a first-cousin mating. The inbreeding coefficient for a first cousin mating is 6.25%, which is considered a mild level of inbreeding. Lists of inbreeding coefficients based on different types of matings are shown in the table below.
Coefficients for Sample Matings
|
Type of Mating |
Inbreeding Coefficient |
Percentage of Blood to Listed Ancestor |
Parent x Offspring |
25.00% |
Parent |
75.0% |
Full Brother x Sister |
25.00% |
Common Grandparent |
50.0% |
Father x Granddaughter |
12.50% |
Father |
62.5% |
Half-Brother x Half-Sister |
12.50% |
Common Grandparent |
50.0% |
Uncle x Niece |
12.50% |
Common Grandparent |
37.5% |
First-Cousin Mating |
6.25% |
Common GreatGrandparent |
25.0% |
In Bilye's pedigree, an inbreeding coefficient based on four generations computes to 7.81%. This is not significantly different from the estimate based on the first-cousin mating alone. Inbreeding coefficients based on increasing numbers of generations are as follows: five generations, 13.34%; six generations, 18.19%; seven generations, 22.78%; eight generations, 24.01%; ten generations, 28.63%; and twelve generations, 30.81%. The inbreeding coefficient of 30.81 percent is more than what you would find in a parent-to-offspring mating (25%). As you can see, the background inbreeding has far more influence on the total inbreeding coefficient than the first-cousin mating, which only appears to be its strongest influence.
Knowledge of the degree of inbreeding in a pedigree does not necessarily help you unless you know whose genes are being concentrated. The percent blood coefficient measures the relatedness between an ancestor and the individual represented by the pedigree. It estimates the probable percentage of genes passed down from a common ancestor. We know that a parent passes on an average of 50% of its genes, while a grandparent passes on 25%, a great-grandparent 12.5%, and so on. For every time the ancestor appears in the pedigree, its percentage of passed-on genes can be added up and its "percentage of blood" estimated.
In many breeds, an influential individual may not appear until later generations, but then will appear so many times that it necessarily contributes a large proportion of genes to the pedigree. This can occur in breeds, due to either prolific ancestors (usually stud dogs), or with a small population of dogs originating the breed. Based on a twenty-five generation pedigree of Bilye, there are only 852 unique ancestors who appear a total of over twenty-million times.
Pedigree Analysis of Laurel Hill Braxfield Bilye (computed to 25 generations)
Linebred Ancesters |
Percentage of blood |
Appearance in pedigree from 1st Generation |
# times in pedigree |
CH Afternod Drambuie |
33.20% |
6 |
33 |
CH Afternod Sue |
27.05% |
7 |
61 |
CH Afternod Callant |
26.56% |
5 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
"Grand-Parents" |
25.00% |
2 |
1 |
CH Sutherland Gallant |
25.00% |
3 |
2 |
CH Sutherland MacDuff |
25.00% |
3 |
3 |
CH Sutherland Lass of Shambray |
25.00% |
3 |
2 |
CH Wilson's Corrie, CD |
22.30% |
7 |
200 |
CH Afternod Buchanon |
20.22% |
7 |
48 |
Loch Adair Diana of Redchico |
17.97% |
5 |
12 |
CH EEG's Scotia Nodrog Rettes |
17.76% |
8 |
181 |
Afternod Ember of Gordon Hill |
17.14% |
8 |
76 |
CH Afternod Hickory |
16.21% |
6 |
27 |
CH Black Rogue of Serlway |
15.72% |
9 |
480 |
CH Afternod Woodbine |
14.45% |
6 |
15 |
CH Fast's Falcon of Windy Hill |
13.82% |
8 |
66 |
Afternod Fidemac |
13.67% |
5 |
7 |
CH Page's MacDonegal II |
13.43% |
7 |
56 |
Afternod Hedera |
13.38% |
7 |
56 |
CH Downside Bonnie of Serlway |
12.90% |
10 |
708 |
Peter of Crombie |
12.76% |
11 |
3,887 |
|
|
|
|
"Great-Grand-Parents" |
12.50% |
3 |
1 |
CH Afternod Amber |
12.50% |
5 |
5 |
Ben of Crombie |
11.83% |
11 |
7,584 |
Stylish William |
11.18% |
13 |
23,764 |
Stylish Billie |
11.08% |
14 |
70,542 |
Stylish Ranger |
10.80% |
15 |
297,331 |
CH Afternod Kate |
10.74% |
6 |
17 |
Heather Grouse |
10.61% |
16 |
1,129,656 |
Afternod Hedemac |
10.45% |
7 |
28 |
The above analysis shows the ancestral contribution of the linebred ancestors in Bilye's pedigree. Those dogs in color were present in the five-generation pedigree. CH Afternod Drambuie has the highest genetic contribution of all of the linebred ancestors. He appears 33 times between the sixth and eighth generations. One appearance in the sixth generation contributes 1.56% of the genes to the pedigree. His total contribution is 33.2% of Bilye's genes, second only to the parents. Therefore, in this pedigree, the most influential ancestor doesn't even appear in the five-generation pedigree. His dam, CH Afternod Sue, appears 61 times between the seventh and tenth generations, and contributes more genes to the pedigree than a grandparent.
Foundation dogs that formed the Gordon Setter breed also play a great role in the genetic makeup of today's dogs. Heather Grouse appears over one million times between the sixteenth and twenty-fifth generations, and almost doubles those appearances beyond the twenty-fifth generation. He contributes over ten percent of the genes to Bilye's pedigree. This example shows that the depth of the pedigree is very important in estimating the genetic makeup of an individual. Any detrimental recessive genes carried by Heather Grouse or other founding dogs, would be expected to be widespread in the breed.
Breeding by Appearance
Many breeders plan matings solely on the appearance of a dog and not on its pedigree or the relatedness of the prospective parents. This is called assortative mating. Breeders use positive assortative matings (like-to-like) to solidify traits, and negative assortative matings (like-to-unlike) when they wish to correct traits or bring in traits their breeding stock may lack.
Some individuals may share desirable characteristics, but they inherit them differently. This is especially true of polygenic traits, such as ear set, bite, or length of forearm. Breeding two phenotypically similar but genotypically unrelated dogs together would not necessarily reproduce these traits. Conversely, each individual with the same pedigree will not necessarily look or breed alike.
Breedings should not be planned solely on the basis of the pedigree or appearance alone. Matings should be based on a combination of appearance and ancestry. If you are trying to solidify a certain trait - like topline - and it is one you can observe in the parents and the linebred ancestors of two related dogs, then you can be more confident that you will attain your goal.
Back to Top
Go to PART III
|